From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 3 15:27:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 7EB2C16A419; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:27:06 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20070803152706.GA33159@FreeBSD.org> References: <200708012048.l71KmKjg080201@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070802084423.GA93647@FreeBSD.org> <46B1ACE0.8050308@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46B1ACE0.8050308@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, "Simon L. Nielsen" , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/contrib/bind9/bin/named client.c src/contrib/bind9/lib/dns dispatch.c src/contrib/bind9/lib/dns/include/dns dispatch.h src/contrib/tcpdump print-bgp.c src/etc/rc.d jail src/sys/conf newvers.sh X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:27:06 -0000 On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:07:28AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 08:48:20PM +0000, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > >> simon 2007-08-01 20:48:19 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD src repository > >> > >> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_5_5) > >> . UPDATING > >> contrib/bind9/bin/named client.c > >> contrib/bind9/lib/dns dispatch.c > >> contrib/bind9/lib/dns/include/dns dispatch.h > >> contrib/tcpdump print-bgp.c > >> etc/rc.d jail > >> sys/conf newvers.sh > >> Log: > >> Correct a bug in the patch for FreeBSD-SA-07:01.jail which prevented > >> jails with custom fstab's from starting due to use of incorrect > >> variable. [1] > >> > >> Correct buffer overflow in tcpdump(1). [SA-07:06] > >> > >> Correct predictable query ids in named(8). [SA-07:07] > > > > What about RELENG_4, is it going to be fixed, or these bugs are not > > applicable to it? > > No and no. Support has been dropped for 4.x, so it's not relevant, > even if it had BIND 9 in the base, which it doesn't. OK, but what about tcpdump(1)? Even so, does it read that 4.X is not vulnerable? ./danfe