Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:24:59 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: ISP driver and FreeBSD Message-ID: <4EFC864B.6080702@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <CAG%2Br6L_t0U4x1yv4-oUGSP%2BQLvcW28eGjULMw2oX2k%2Br1bid3A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAG%2Br6L8qNvgVQ8cb1Hd%2Bekrnifmqvnh5ztmDqDZqQcG75rPw4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG%2Br6L-e6NAA=jOQQ8V13%2Bp-3fBMV0aEsWybScs5e7uE4AbbfA@mail.gmail.com> <4EFC7D8C.1000904@feral.com> <CAG%2Br6L_t0U4x1yv4-oUGSP%2BQLvcW28eGjULMw2oX2k%2Br1bid3A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/29/2011 7:18 AM, Omer Faruk SEN wrote: > still no luck. Can we say that FreeBSD SAN Support is not mature enough? > Because I have tried IBM Storage too a few years ago and have taken nearly > same error with FreeBSD 7.2 > Umm. On the one hand I want to say "no, it's mature enough, it works for many people, just about as well as any other SAN implementation does. I've been connecting various SAN entities, including EMCs, to FreeBSD for ten years or more", but on the other hand your experience really does say otherwise. Regrets.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EFC864B.6080702>