From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Feb 6 18:26:37 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D9233360; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D6Mc2JhJz4PKj; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 18:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 016IQXUY003477; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 016IQXI8003476; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <202002061826.016IQXI8003476@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r357624 - in head/sbin: . sunlabel In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:26:33 -0800 (PST) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Warner Losh , src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48D6Mc2JhJz4PKj X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[rgrimes@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.71)[-0.706,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.65)[0.649,0]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.03)[ip: (0.13), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.07), asn: 13868(0.03), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 18:26:37 -0000 > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:57 AM Rodney W. Grimes > wrote: > > > > Author: imp > > > Date: Thu Feb 6 17:52:02 2020 > > > New Revision: 357624 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357624 > > > > > > Log: > > > No need to make sunlabel anymore > > > > > > It was only built on sparc64. Since it wasn't a general tool on other > > > architectures, no need to keep it around for another release. > > > > > > Reviewed by: emaste > > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23524 > > > > Should not this whole sparc64 removal have had some deprecation notices > > put in and merged back to 11 and 12 to give users a pro-active notice > > that it is gone_in(13)? > > > > We should definitely put it in the 11 and 12 release notes. That's a good > idea. Random thought, dont pay it too much attention but: DEPRECATED sitting next to RELNOTES? Or even a specific section in RELNOTES? Thought that is not suppose to be MFC'ed. > We can put a printf in the kernel so everybody sees it on boot. I'll make > that change, though I don't think gone_in is quite right there (I'll check > before I commit). This should cover all bases. > > For all the utilities that are installed on all the platforms I'll do it > (like I did for elf2aout), but for utilities that are only on sparc64, I > have no plans to do it. They are covered by the general 'sparc64 is removed > in FreeBSD 13.0'. I think this is a reasonable compromise that catches the > corner cases where people are using a utility not on sparc64, but that > we're removing it while saving a little bit of work which is rather tedious > and error prone for a utility that one could not reasonably expect to be in > 13. That seems a reasonble best effort to me. > It's the MFC bit that makes this somewhat tedious because we normally > do those days later... That shouldnt effect it as long as the MFC'able commit is done first, then the removal commit. > Warner -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org