Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 08:31:11 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, hackers@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: Patch to Makefile.inc1 to mention which kernel config is being installed Message-ID: <201001080831.11719.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100105141557.G88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20100105132921.GN86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20100105141108.GO86359@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <20100105141557.G88477@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 05 January 2010 9:17:22 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:59:13PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: > >> > >>> Attached patch is against head; for the above, I had patched stable/7. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> INSTKERNNAME rather than INSTALLKERNEL? > > > > Well, I was interested in knowing which config was being used, not so > > much what the name of the subdirectory in /boot was going to be. > > > > (Default value for INSTKERNNAME is "kernel", which isn't something I > > find useful to report.) > > Woopps. Cache-corruption;-) The original one is fine then. Or maybe 'Installing INSTALLKERNEL as INSTKERNNAME'. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201001080831.11719.jhb>