Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:06:44 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recent branching of CURRENT Message-ID: <470FFE04.2080804@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <200710130052.00714.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <470FDB17.2080900@intersonic.se> <470FE3F4.50309@FreeBSD.org> <200710130052.00714.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mel wrote: > On Friday 12 October 2007 23:15:32 Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Just out of curiosity, why did I fail to notice the branching of >>> RELENG_7 and 8-CURRENT? I'm subscribed to -stable, -current and >>> -announce. >> Because it's an administrative change that is just a normal part of the >> release engineering process. i.e. 7.0 is not released etc. > > And RELENG_7 is not considered the 'stable' branch yet, but 8-CURRENT is just > forked for development of entirely new features? I.o.w. do we 2 current or 2 > stable branches now? I would assume we have one current still (8-) and a pile of -STABLE (2.2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6- and now 7-).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?470FFE04.2080804>