From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 08:00:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5D106567D; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp7.yandex.ru (smtp7.yandex.ru [213.180.200.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4215A8FC26; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from ns.kirov.so-cdu.ru ([77.72.136.145]:44518 "EHLO [127.0.0.1]" smtp-auth: "bu7cher" TLS-CIPHER: "DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA keybits 256/256 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S738652AbYFKIAN (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:00:13 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp7 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1213171213 X-MsgDayCount: 8 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp7.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: bu7cher Message-ID: <484F8609.3090601@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:00:09 +0400 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5 (FreeBSD/20051231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?U8O4cmVuIFNjaG1pZHQ=?= References: <484F7EF9.5080602@yandex.ru> <5291278A-81B5-4665-B5FF-1A6B2EC9CD15@FreeBSD.ORG> In-Reply-To: <5291278A-81B5-4665-B5FF-1A6B2EC9CD15@FreeBSD.ORG> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [RFC] patch to AHCI device detection code X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:00:19 -0000 Søren Schmidt wrote: > Well, as you can see I tried this when I added the PM code to AHCI, > however one of the reasons I left it out again (for now) is that it > doesn't work on more than about 50% of the AHCI chipsets out there.. > > Modern HW in a nutshell, you win some you loose some ;) Hm.. I think it can't made regression. I don't see nothing dangerous in addition 1s waiting (it doesn't enable softreset code, only PxTFD reading loop).. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov