From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 09:26:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184D610656DE; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AEE8FC08; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 09:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so356854qyk.13 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:26:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.46.5 with SMTP id h5mr6206885qaf.201.1283417751613; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.8 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:55:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: <20100831215915.GE1932@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <20100831215915.GE1932@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 01:55:51 -0700 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS v28 is ready for wider testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:26:09 -0000 On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrot= e: > > Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.= bz2 > buildworld on i386 (yes I know ZFS isn't ideal there): =3D=3D=3D> cddl/lib/libdtrace (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=3Dprescott -I/usr/obj/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/dev/dtrace/i386 -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/compat/opensolaris/include -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/head -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libctf/= common -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtr= ace/common -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/co= mmon -I/usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/int= el -DDIS_MEM -DNEED_SOLARIS_BOOLEAN -std=3Dgnu89 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unknown-pragmas -c /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace= /common/dt_aggregate.c In file included from /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/bitmap= .h:36, from /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace= /common/dt_impl.h:33, from /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libdtrace= /common/dt_aggregate.c:33: /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:132: error: static declaration of 'atomic_cas_ptr' follows non-static declaration /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:42: error: previous declaration of 'atomic_cas_ptr' was here cc1: warnings being treated as errors /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h: In function 'atomic_cas_ptr': /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:133: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:134: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:134: warning: passing argument 1 of 'atomic_cas_32' from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/cddl/lib/libdtrace/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/atomic= .h:134: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size *** Error code 1 I tried applying the patch to r212087 to rule out recent changes to dtrace, but it made no difference. I used patch -E -p0 < patch. --=20 Rob Farmer