From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 20:50:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5537E16A400 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3138E13C45E for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 20:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l58KnaA5085826; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:49:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l58KnZ6o085823; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:49:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Achim Patzner In-Reply-To: <232616AA-03AF-4909-9177-CCE2E3CFF53C@bnc.net> Message-ID: <20070608134658.G85746@ns1.feral.com> References: <200706081547.l58FlEsb084443@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070608113000.E85226@ns1.feral.com> <232616AA-03AF-4909-9177-CCE2E3CFF53C@bnc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anybody terminate an IP-IP tunnel for me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:50:05 -0000 > On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: >> The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing routing >> for somebody else's Class C block. > > Why? > > inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255 > netname: LEMIS-LAN > descr: LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems > descr: D-W-6324 Feldatal > descr: Germany > country: DE > admin-c: GL3-RIPE > tech-c: GL3-RIPE > rev-srv: allegro.lemis.de > rev-srv: ns.cls.net > rev-srv: ns.maz.net > mnt-by: AS2871-MNT > status: ASSIGNED PI > source: RIPE # Filtered > > Its current provider was able to add it to their AS, too so it shouldn't be > that much of a problem in Australia. I remember my ISP (QSC Germany) being a > bit too... unexperienced at first so they sent me on to one of their > resellers (who knew how to configure BGP) and they warned me that they > wouldn't accept anything less than a /22 but things might be a bit different > on the wrong side of the planet. > > I'd just get the defunct rev-srv records out of the database entry and send > an update for the ownership records. In general ISPs are now very reluctant do less than a /22 or larget if it's not carved out of one of their blocks. It was a fair amount of hunting around in Menlo Park for me to find somebody to route FERAL.COM, and the big home serving ISPs like Sprint and Yahoo!/SBC were completely clueless about being asked if they would do so- even for a fee. -matt