From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 11 13:22:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA10920 for current-outgoing; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from bofh.cybercity.dk (bofh.cybercity.dk [195.8.128.254]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA10913; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 13:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (phk.cybercity.dk [195.8.133.247]) by bofh.cybercity.dk (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA11113; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 22:24:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from critter.dk.tfs.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.dk.tfs.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) with ESMTP id WAA24480; Tue, 11 Mar 1997 22:24:15 +0100 (MET) To: Brian Somers cc: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= , brian@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-current Subject: Re: ppp & signals pending In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Mar 1997 20:04:18 GMT." <199703112004.UAA06847@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 22:24:14 +0100 Message-ID: <24478.858115454@critter.dk.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Tricky. As you say, it's difficult to test this stuff. Trying to prove >it with statistics will be tricky too, AFAIK, the stdio libs won't >recurse too well and they call malloc() to boot. The next version of phkmalloc() will probably have a flag that will make it reentrant (by blocking signals while in malloc of course :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.