From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 13 01:35:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD8AA6EBD3 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D593107A for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pgB423tS1zr4; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:28:18 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3pgB416mMqz2hP; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:28:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:28:17 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Paul Keusemann Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with package library dependencies after update from 8.4 to 9.3 Message-ID: <20160113012817.GA45513@over-yonder.net> References: <56952DF6.3050309@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56952DF6.3050309@gmail.com> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24-fullermd.4 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:35:56 -0000 On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:46:46AM -0600 I heard the voice of Paul Keusemann, and lo! it spake thus: > > and I now have a number of installed packages that are claiming > libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 as a required shlib but there are no packages > that provide it. It does exist in /usr/local/lib. This would be the mildly annoying behavior of pkg since a couple updates ago, where it doesn't recognize shlib symlinks right. I think there's been a thread or two about it. I'd just ignore it. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.