From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul  6 06:33:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B6F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  6 Jul 2004 06:33:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from titania.auscert.org.au (gw.auscert.org.au [203.5.112.28])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0854A43D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  6 Jul 2004 06:33:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au)
Received: from app.auscert.org.au (app [10.0.1.192])i666Xs2V007482
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:33:54 +1000 (EST)
Received: from app.auscert.org.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by app.auscert.org.au (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i666XuiP077911
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:33:56 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <200407060633.i666XuiP077911@app.auscert.org.au>
From: freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:55:35 MST."
             <200407052055.35738.kstewart@owt.com> 
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 16:33:56 +1000
Subject: Re: apache port broken for 4.10 RELEASE? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 06:33:59 -0000

Thanks Kent (and Phil and Udo).

I have a couple of questions though.

If 2.0.49 apache is broken in 4.10 release (install +ports), why do the
MD5 sums exist in distinfo for this particular version at all (rather than
just a simple "not supported for this release" error)

and

What benefit is there (apart from FreeBSD-friendly install paths) to
installing the port over than building from the standard sources anyway,
which I usually do and have done already with this combination or 4.10 and
2.0.49? And, I guess, why does it build successfully this way anyway?

cheers all,
-- Joel Hatton --
Security Analyst and FIRST Representative  | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national CERT        | Fax:     +61 7 3365 7031
The University of Queensland               | WWW:     www.auscert.org.au
Qld 4072 Australia                         | Email:   auscert@auscert.org.au

> On Monday 05 July 2004 07:04 pm, freebsd-stable@auscert.org.au wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When attempting to make in /usr/ports/www/apache2 I get the error:
> >
> > ===> apache-2.0.49 is marked as broken: unknown LIBTOOL version: 13
> >
> > Is there a solution for this?
> >
> 
> It wants something different. The current version of Apache is 2.0.50 
> and its dependancies are
> 
> Port:   apache-2.0.50
> Path:   /usr/ports/www/apache2
> Info:   Version 2 of Apache web server with prefork MPM.
> Maint:  clement@FreeBSD.org
> Index:  www ipv6
> B-deps: autoconf-2.59_1 expat-1.95.7 libiconv-1.9.1_3 libtool-1.5.6_1 
> m4-1.4_1 openssl-0.9.7d perl-5.8.4
> R-deps: expat-1.95.7 libiconv-1.9.1_3 openssl-0.9.7d perl-5.8.4 
> rc_subr-1.29
> 
> That built on 2 of my systems without any problems.
> 
> Kent
> 
> -- 
> Kent Stewart
> Richland, WA
> 
> http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html