From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jun  3 23:50:59 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA11468
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 23:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA11449;
          Wed, 3 Jun 1998 23:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA20665;
	Wed, 3 Jun 1998 23:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: dg@root.com
cc: gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Matt Behrens: Re: kernel compile problem 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jun 1998 21:48:02 PDT."
             <199806040448.VAA27776@implode.root.com> 
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 23:50:31 -0700
Message-ID: <20661.896943031@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>    Not speaking for Justin, but I don't believe it was never his plan to
> bring CAM into -stable; he only wanted to make it easier to share the code
> base between -current and -stable by adding the necessary infrustructure.

OK, I guess I didn't mean to bite his nose off, but you sure have to
admit that tweaking config's tail like this, with its current
limitations and all, is a very painful thing to do in -stable and is
perhaps something which should be avoided at all possible cost in the
future until it's "fixed" somehow.  It would have been better, IMHO,
if the necessary infrastructural changes had simply remained bundled
with the 2.2-stable patch set.

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message