From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 08:52:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE9D16A4BF for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAC443FBF for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: from blues.seekingfire.prv (blues.seekingfire.prv [192.168.23.211]) by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CB4A6 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:52:11 -0600 (CST) Received: (from tillman@localhost) by blues.seekingfire.prv (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h7KFqBg06092 for FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:52:11 -0600 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:52:11 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030820095211.Y2526@seekingfire.com> References: <20030820110031.6953360b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030820110031.6953360b.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>; from trhodes@freebsd.org on Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:00:31AM -0400 X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers Subject: Re: Kerberos in the handbook X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:52:13 -0000 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:00:31AM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm pondering the following question: > > What exactly do we do with the kerberos information in the handbook? > I have a Kerberos5 document which is nearly complete, should it: > > o Be a new chapter? > o Be added as a second part to the current KerberosIV information? > o Should I place it in the Security chapter, move the current section > to KerberosIV, add a note that Kerberos5 is only in FreeBSD 5.1 and > beyond? > > I'm leaning toward the last option but would like a few general > comments first. If you go with option 3, I'd clarify it by saying that "Kerberos5 is the only version of Kerberos in FreeBSD 5.1 and beyond", otherwise it sounds like 4.X and newer didn't have Kerberos5. -T -- If you are not happy here and now, you never will be. Taisen Deshimaru