Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 16:51:52 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued Message-ID: <19970803165152.07652@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199708021824.WAA00744@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>; from Dmitrij Tejblum on Sat, Aug 02, 1997 at 10:24:30PM %2B0400 References: <199708021013.TAA09852@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> <199708021824.WAA00744@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 02, 1997 at 10:24:30PM +0400, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> > Ports should have less (or no) "official" support on -current.
>
> No. Ports should have more (full) "official" support for 2.2. If
> Satoshi can not build packages for both 2.2 and -current, I prefer
> packages for 2.2.
You donīt get the point, that -current of today is -release and -stable
of tomorrow. If -current changes to much, who will port the 1200
applications to 3.0 if that becomes the next release ;)
--
Andreas Klemm | klemm.gtn.com - powered by
Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD
http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html
http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/benches.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970803165152.07652>