From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 12:43:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7B5106564A for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ottk@zzz.ee) Received: from zzz.ee (kalah.zzz.ee [194.204.30.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC10B8FC32 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:43:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ottk@zzz.ee) Received: from zzz.ee (localhost.zzz.ee [127.0.0.1]) by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E596BFD305 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:43:44 +0200 (EET) Received: by zzz.ee (Postfix, from userid 3019) id E40B2FD2E7; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:43:44 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin on spamassassin.zzz.ee X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Guessed-Language: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50 X-Spam-Checker-URL: http://info.zzz.ee Received: from ott.sise (adsl215.uninet.ee [194.204.62.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA89FD23B for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:43:42 +0200 (EET) From: Ott =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6stner?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:43:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net> In-Reply-To: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200812181443.41413.ottk@zzz.ee> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP @zzz.ee Subject: Re: listserver problems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:43:46 -0000 On Thursday 18 December 2008 1:47:01 pm Michael Scheidell wrote: > might be generic listserver issues, but I noticed that at least on=20 > freebsd-jail list, it does NOT strip out dkim/domainkeys signatures. >=20 > that might not be to bad, but it does 'mung' the headers, so dkim signed= =20 > email passed through freebsd mailing list server comes back as a forged=20 > signature. Probably depends, how and with what software you check it. At least, SpamAs= sassin responds correctly to this signature: X-Spam-Status: No, score=3D-3.5 required=3D5.0 tests=3DBAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Checker-URL: http://info.zzz.ee Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBEFD53A for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:48:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81916315A; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEC106571F; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19D1065679; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from fl.us.spammertrap.net (fl.us.spammertrap.net [204.89.241.173= ]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338948FC32; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E43E6089; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=3D1; a=3Drsa-sha256; c=3Drelaxed/simple; d=3Dsecnap.net; = h=3D content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=3Ddkim; t=3D 1229600821; bh=3DD2GNQjbJ0V6T+z6wbS0oY6z3CMZTNqKW4+nF83Mp06k=3D; b=3DY tjC87NB2Vu+z8zFh6JMsKQhxhlNafGj3yyQMJW/EvfyDDQxsMWtvx/kx5gRJnHDD oJOt0zcSAXUTiD/EhOuRCrb3KOr1nErTcWPns31B44q/4dL7l09vnuT+VswvRZoZ 3jZFZZGHZRr2FtOjgdDQkJKZIk0elPc2i67Bif30Hc=3D X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - fl.us.spammertrap.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) SME-150 1.89 at fl.us.spammertrap.net Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99E5E6088; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from 21.sub-70-222-163.myvzw.com ([10.80.0.4]) by secnap3.secnap.= com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);=20 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net> =20 > whoever is working on the listservers can contact me for assistance on=20 > it. maybe just a postfix header IGNORE rule would strip it back out. Talking about Mailman configuration, personally I would like if these maili= nglists here had 'subject_prefix', something like [FreeBSD-QUESTIONS:%d]=20 Greetings, O.K. =2D-=20 M=F5=F5da oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/