From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 28 20:22:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id UAA26500 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 20:22:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA26467 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 20:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from husky.cslab.vt.edu (jaitken@husky.cs.vt.edu [128.173.41.87]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id UAA05596 for ; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 20:21:56 -0800 Received: (jaitken@localhost) by husky.cslab.vt.edu (8.6.12/8.6.4) id XAA32320; Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:20:33 -0500 From: Jeff Aitken Message-Id: <199601290420.XAA32320@husky.cslab.vt.edu> Subject: Re: what does this mean To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:20:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: jaitken@cslab.vt.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199601290007.BAA04536@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Jan 29, 96 01:07:53 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Which kernel? The kernel.GENERIC from 2.1R? Otherwise, we'd need the > output of ``nm /kernel | sort | more'' around address 0xf0198002. Doh! Well, you see, therein lies the problem ;) We distributed a release of 2.0.5 to the students on CD, with a few local changes (e.g., retrofitted ATAPI support). But I don't know if he's running *our* generic kernel, the 2.0.5 generic kernel, or one he compiled himself. Heck, he may have even tried to install 2.1 if he had no success with 2.0.5. I'll ask him to send you the requested information. -- Jeff Aitken jaitken@cs.vt.edu