Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:32:38 -0500
From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0
Message-ID: <a75ee95d-f760-bb8c-531b-183c52211e2d@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu>
References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <a75ee95d-f760-bb8c-531b-183c52211e2d@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0
References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org>
<20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu>
--7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
On 01/21/2017 09:13, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>=20
>> I'd like anyone possible to test an updated version of
>> emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11}. I have the patch here for those who
>> wish to build themselves:
>>
>> https://people.freebsd.org/~swills/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-10.1.0.=
diff
>=20
> I tried to built it on=20
>=20
> 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M
>=20
> (why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?)
Because some of your source is r307013 and other parts of your src tree
has been updated to r31165. The M stands for "modified", which can mean
you have local patches, but in this case may just mean the whole tree
isn't at the same rev. I'm not completely sure at the moment.
>=20
> and it failed to build with:
>=20
> utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwin=
d_GetCFA'
> is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> uintptr_t cfa =3D _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx);
> ^
> utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> '_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99
> [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> _Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data);
> ^
> utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'?
>=20
> Any ideas ?
>=20
No, that's odd. I built on r311854 and had no issue. Maybe you could see
if you see the same?
Steve
--7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO--
--LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=PSGG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a75ee95d-f760-bb8c-531b-183c52211e2d>