From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Aug 11 01:51:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8031055C84 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453C2858A3 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 09C181055C80; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA281055C7F for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84FC08589D for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3E5C221 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7B1pJAc002829 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w7B1pJMC002827 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230402] With buildworld, the system can not use swap Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 01:51:21 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230402 --- Comment #7 from Mark Millard --- Mark Johnston has indicated that after investigations in small armv7 and aarch64 examples, such as rpi3's and rpi2's (V1.1): I do think the default [vm.pageout_oom_seq] value is too low and will get that addressed in 12.0. Mark J. had someone with rpi3 and rpi2 (V1.1) usage experiment with: sysctl vm.pageout_oom_seq=3D120 and things got much farther but it was not a cure. While not a cure but it was discovered that when some other changes were made ("lowering the pagedaemon sleep period") a fair time ago, vm.pageout_oom_seq was not rescaled to roughly match, making OOM kills happen easier. There are some patches for reporting information that Mark J. has indicated will likely have some variant become standard FreeBSD code that could be enabled without needing patches, targeting 12.0 having such. The lists have a long history tied to the investigations on arm. I'll reference the first Mark Johnston message here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2018-August/018506.html His messages have most of the technical content tied to internal evidence his patches produced and what might be done. (Other folks produced data from there environments, mostly one person.) The prior activity does not get much into internal activity tied to the issue. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=