From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 16:30:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D6316A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA5143D49 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:30:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so672929rnf for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:30:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=J1jNJ6RVrX7iujiDEzurNual9aqXnWulZXvXfWOLSGTG7o19Hfu5fGcczgkrsNO1HA54h4Ja1bHULlIUlKM9Dsvhz7EUYJQxfs+2Xz/QkCNYABTnk08l/H038nw++o3nHVU4CCSVVMTMyGw/rgaygJVqaMezzOSrXAHKmT7mjYU= Received: by 10.38.209.7 with SMTP id h7mr290340rng; Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.64 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:30:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:30:50 +0200 From: Sander Vesik To: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20041201.131943.783371855.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041201.131943.783371855.chat95@mac.com> cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: m62 break in sw X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sander Vesik List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:30:52 -0000 On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:19:43 +0900 (JST), NAKATA Maho wrote: > In Message-ID: > Sander Vesik wrote: > > > blah, on a rebuild, I don't see it again so I guess the answer is "no"... > > Thanks for your report. I wonder what bison you are using. AFAIK, bison > 1.875 breaks somewhere I don't remember. and I'm requesting a repocopy. > However, this haven't processed yet. I also made a gcc-3.4.1+ > visibility+enum fix port, which Hamburg RE uses and > I don't even raise a PR (IssueZilla for FreeBSD). > I'm using bison 1.75. Given that sw build on the second try I don't think it was bison related. There are however problems with javaldx (which doesn't like the BSD way of calling the jdk 1.4.2-p6 or similar and needs patching) and something with libxml2.so version. And epm has some more complaints.... > Thanks a lot, > -- NAKATA, Maho > >