From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 16:51:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8D9106564A for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BE18FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so6677031eyd.13 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:51:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bFS82h+NSGd1KpyDFFz93v3VSW6pk8ue6zKeIQBIp5I=; b=awiaJFQwoWYQQHbApVs5q6/emW+9RCv1rDAgupODyixJ3mLRSRdjkzrbhOCBo1Ghxt 3tTBUd5bMkIDxzekf/7lW+dB9cVtORa0tQ6Y/i2GwQBnGn1YQjDjnL+y/FQ5eXQWphxY RbU0Kc00mNDVcDRMJEWwYBU/PhNEn8JPjH7U4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.50.65 with SMTP id a1mr1095026obo.17.1321289492250; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.7.34 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:51:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <82C85C01-62C4-4E75-B3F2-59D703CA5D78@gsoft.com.au> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:51:32 -0800 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Dan The Man Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: samba+zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:51:34 -0000 On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Dan The Man wrote: > > > Thankyou for suggestion Peter , didn't solve it, and no its not the disks , > I have been monitoring gstat and its doing what it should, NFS works just > fine. ... > Its always sitting in rpcsvc around 2% cpu doing what it should. > > Samba on other hand what I find interesting is I tried to see what truss > would show on smbd while writing today and found the following: ... > It actually seems to be running some timed event smbd_idle literally holding > up process for many seconds all the time.... Hmm... samba seems slower (high latency opening files) today than before. Granted, I just reinstalled Windows 7 on my client box so I need to poke around it to determine what the issue is. Thanks, -Garrett