Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:13:45 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [tysont@montana.edu: Is Adaptec 2930 a typo?] Message-ID: <19990812111345.E54146@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <37B13EE6.11DE6A85@3-cities.com>; from Kent Stewart on Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 02:14:14AM -0700 References: <19990810162452.C84421@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <37B13EE6.11DE6A85@3-cities.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 02:14:14AM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote: > > This popped up on -doc. I don't know anything about the support for > > the 2930 -- is our documentation wrong, or has something else gone wrong > > for this chap? > > If you go to http://www.adaptec.com/products/solutions/pcscsi.html, > you can see there are several types of 2930's. A comparison of between <snip> Thanks. That doesn't answer the central question though, which is "Does FreeBSD actually support the 2930?" If it doesn't then I need to pull the references to it from the documentation. N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990812111345.E54146>