From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jul 10 17:49:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-177-51.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.177.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B7037BAD5 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:49:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08039; Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:57:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200007110057.RAA08039@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kernel printf %i? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:35:53 PDT." <20000710173553.J25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 17:57:27 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > * Brian Fundakowski Feldman [000710 17:17] wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > any objections: > > > > Can you give me a good reason for it? To act like the libc printf() isn't > > a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways > > that %d doesn't? Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that > > have %i and don't work correctly or something? > > > > I just don't get it :-/ > > I was annoyed when I used %i and it didn't work. POLA. Can I have %Z? It should take an integer argument, and print that many 'fnord's. Thankyou. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message