From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:40:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F3116A47A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC713C4D3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E2547396; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:40:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:40:30 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Greg Troxel In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080121203838.G4194@fledge.watson.org> References: <18CC5A4A2AC36D7FF57615EE@ganymede.hub.org> <478AF6BC.8050604@highperformance.net> <20080114142124.Y55696@fledge.watson.org> <20080116085630.GA32361@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080117080359.U51764@fledge.watson.org> <20080118073445.GA30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118095652.GC30721@pappardelle.tekno.chalmers.se> <20080118103952.D18977@fledge.watson.org> <20080118210621.GF7898@cs.cmu.edu> <20080118211556.T46437@fledge.watson.org> <20080119005938.Q53920@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jan Harkes Subject: Re: Coda on FreeBSD problem reports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:40:31 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Greg Troxel wrote: > Coda support in NetBSD (-current and netbsd-4 branch) is mostly ok, so you > may want to glance at that for reference while working on the FreeBSD > support. Greg, I was looking at the NetBSD Coda parts over the weekend, but it seemed that most of the bugs in the FreeBSD code were due to gradual rot as VFS evolved and our Coda module source didn't remain code up. I notice that NetBSD still supports CODA_COMPAT_5 as well -- is there any reason to keep on doing this, really? I understand originally it was because Coda 5 remained under the BSD license and Coda 6 was under GPL, but it's been a while since anyone did anything with Coda 5. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge