From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 27 5:42:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from m-net.arbornet.org (m-net.arbornet.org [209.142.209.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5097337B404 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 05:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (polytarp@localhost) by m-net.arbornet.org (8.11.1/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g4RCPxo25687; Mon, 27 May 2002 08:25:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from polytarp@m-net.arbornet.org) Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 08:25:58 -0400 (EDT) From: pgreen To: Terry Lambert Cc: Rahul Siddharthan , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss In-Reply-To: <3CF1CDD7.A210BF97@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 26 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > pgreen wrote: > > Well, you have to think counter-unpartisanly. For example, using > > Ruminov's Ruminition, you can think of any idea, regardless of > > linguistical barriers. For example, let's say an Episcipitalian wishes to > > know how to know. By using Ruminov's Ruminition, he is able to: A) Think, > > purely using emotions, a language inate in any human, of the > > children. B) This, of course, leads to only one conclusion: 1) Anything > > can be known, in the context of one's reality. > > > > Thus, we see how anything can be thunk, regardeless of any so-called > > language. > > So your hypothesis is that emotions constitute a Turing-complete > language? > > -- Terry > Where did I say that? That would obviously be imposible. You're just putting words into my mouth. I suggest you reread my comment, before making such batently untrue statements. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message