From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 07:16:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369AC16A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:16:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman4.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A584B43D1F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:16:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2IFGlD2014212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:16:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B3zG3-0004In-8e; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:16:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4059BD4E.7040803@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:16:30 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vman@tmok.com References: <4059B9E9.80802@fillmore-labs.com> <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> In-Reply-To: <20040318150738.GA87118@k2.homeunix.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/64415: make in ports stopped by ASCII GUI X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:16:49 -0000 Vlad Manilici wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On 18.03.04|16:02, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>PR 64233 will use default options when build with BATCH=yes. > > That doesn't make the cut. The ports should, IMHO, build with > default options by default. It's so simple, it sounds like a > tautology :). It isn't. Provide a rationale. You could just hit `OK' if you are willing to accept the defaults. > Someone closed my report with the following note: "Your PR does provide > neither useful information nor any fixes to ports tree.". Should I fix > it myself now? Patches are always welcome. -Oliver