Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:02:12 +0200
From:      "Karl Andersson (Home.se)" <karland@home.se>
To:        <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is /usr/ports/net/samba fixed? (FreeBSD-SN-3:01)
Message-ID:  <005001c2fed2$e9390290$fe0010ac@zeus>
References:  <20030409121225.A47756@ns.museum.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Last time i checked < meant less-then so

version < (less then) samba-2.2.8_2 or samba-2.2.8a is affected..
current status on port is fixed(?)

(first post ;) )

// Karl Andersson

> A recent security advisory FreeBSD-SN-3:01 says that samba-2.2.8a is
> affected by a security bug.  It also says that this bug has been fixed.
> However my freshly-updated ports tree still has samba-2.2.8a as the
> latest version of this port.
>
> Has the fixed port been committed into the cvs database?  Will I see
> a version greater than 2.2.8a when I have the fixed version?  If no,
> is there a way to test whether the 2.2.8a I have is the broken version
> or the fixed version?
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> >II.  Ports
> >
>
>+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >Port name:      net/samba
> >Affected:       versions < samba-2.2.8_2, samba-2.2.8a
> >Status:         Fixed
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005001c2fed2$e9390290$fe0010ac>