From owner-freebsd-current Sat Nov 2 11:24:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A7937B401 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B9243E42 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:24:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gA2JOWeZ029279; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:24:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gA2JOWRh029278; Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:24:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:24:32 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Mark Murray Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __sF Message-ID: <20021102192432.GC28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20021102181031.GB28779@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200211021906.gA2J6ld0072679@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211021906.gA2J6ld0072679@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 07:06:47PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > > I seriously doubt that NAG will support both a > > 4.x and 5.x version of their compiler. > > This shouldn't be a problem. The commercial software Should Not Be(tm) > supporting something as variable as CURRENT, and with the STABLE libraries > around in COMPAT mode, the compiler Will Just Work(tm) (or should with > not much effort). > > By the time __sF is mainstream, I guess the vendor will have adapted > their product to match. Win, win. > No, it does not just work. The NAG f95 compiler generates a C file. The C file is compiled by gcc. f95 -o a a.f90 is equivalent to f95 -c -o a.c a.f90 gcc -o a a.c -lf96 -lm -lc libf96.so is linked against libc.so, which is a symlink to libc.so.4 on a 4.x system. libm.so and libc.so are symlinks that point to libm.so.2 and libc.so.5 on 5.x. You pick up the wrong libc.so in the above line. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message