From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 24 02:24:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9463216A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:24:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1251243D53 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so348053wra for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fFDKaMyoSgiN1NKeOWuc6KDiHIw0uxOJ2hABDIVjrL0mPM+hLcwknHmsBXso7p+WtQtqtlUPXVAE5uU7hcYfWBMW6zk+tP2lvhoQGQyNrRbcKsg+eODuqpcNyAjBM3DtZhzHZ7fK9jgF6mTj6b/3yFa0xMXTSlmT72afBRssgGs= Received: by 10.54.22.30 with SMTP id 30mr216905wrv; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.40.69 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2fd864e050323182432f78eaa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:24 -0800 From: Astrodog To: Roman Neuhauser In-Reply-To: <20050324011220.GA81046@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2fd864e05032316492d805751@mail.gmail.com> <20050324011220.GA81046@isis.sigpipe.cz> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Astrodog List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:24:25 -0000 On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:12:20 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # astrodog@gmail.com / 2005-03-23 16:49:41 -0800: > > I'm finding a huge number of ports that claim to be i386-only, but > > that seem to work fine on AMD64, even moreso on the Linux compat side. > > Are there any thoughts on how to resolve this? > > Find out in cvs why they have been marked i386-only, and if it > doesn't seem to be the case (anymore), file a PR with a patch. > One for each port. > > -- > How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? > You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. > Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 > How could we denote a linux32 dependancy?