From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  8 21:12:06 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8719C16A46F
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Jun 2007 21:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444E413C44C
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Jun 2007 21:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9F520A5;
	Fri,  8 Jun 2007 22:56:27 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on tim.des.no
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827F320A4;
	Fri,  8 Jun 2007 22:56:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 8343D57C1; Fri,  8 Jun 2007 22:56:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
References: <20070604162430.GA76813@freebsd.org>
	<896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A7F@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com>
	<20070606074429.GA42032@freebsd.org> <4666F0FB.8020101@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070607070455.GA71012@freebsd.org>
	<896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A84@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com>
	<20070607210313.GA603@freebsd.org>
	<896DB1FBFFD5A145833D9DA08CA12A85051A87@seaxch07.desktop.isilon.com>
	<20070608161322.GA27624@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:56:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20070608161322.GA27624@freebsd.org> (Roman Divacky's message of
	"Fri\, 8 Jun 2007 18\:13\:22 +0200")
Message-ID: <86myzadv21.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Eric Lemar <eric.lemar@isilon.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: *at family of syscalls in FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:12:06 -0000

Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:56:39PM -0700, Eric Lemar wrote:
> > Obviously I prefer the wrapping, but I'm just a tad biased :)
> well.. unless I hear some strong voice to change what I have I am not
> changing it. it can always be changed in future.

I would strongly urge you to consider following Eric's suggestion; it is
conceptually far cleaner.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no