From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 28 20:01:22 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727391065679;
	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119E18FC18;
	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF12B3911A;
	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:01:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203)
	id 8F52510059; Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:01:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AE91003D;
	Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:01:24 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:01:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090324043028.GA34952@dragon.NUXI.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0903282055440.11029@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200903120954.n2C9s2ev063133@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20090313023956.GA49511@dragon.NUXI.org>
	<49BA52D2.8090209@FreeBSD.org>
	<20090323231412.GA94221@hub.freebsd.org>
	<20090324012325.GB1292@atarininja.org>
	<20090324043028.GA34952@dragon.NUXI.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>,
	Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash Makefile pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:01:23 -0000

On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David O'Brien wrote:
>>> Is there ever a change then that doesn't require a bump in either
>>> PORTREVISION or PORTVERSION?
>> Just changing the maintainer should not require the user to do anything.
> That is the only case I can think of.  Even changing the comment or
> pkg-descr should have its PORTREVISION bumped in order to get a new
> package built so users have the fresh description.

Setting FORCE_MAKE_JOBS would be another example which should not 
trigger a rebuild for the user.

Or something like the following, which I had embedded in some other
lang/gcc42 changes, but would have committed by itself otherwise:
"Remove gcc-testsuite from DISTFILES, along with the post-build and
check targets.  This reduces disk and bandwidth consumptions for a
feature (apparently) never used."

Gerald