Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 May 1998 11:03:10 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Mostyn Lewis <mrl@teleport.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Year 2000
Message-ID:  <19980515110310.A305@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <199805150109.SAA20144@user2.teleport.com>; from Mostyn Lewis on Thu, May 14, 1998 at 06:09:50PM -0700
References:  <19980515093946.M320@freebie.lemis.com> <199805150109.SAA20144@user2.teleport.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 May 1998 at 18:09:50 -0700, Mostyn Lewis wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 May 1998 at 16:26:06 -0400, PParker@anon.penet.fi wrote:
>>> Is your current version of FreeBSD year 2000 compatable?
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Actually NOT when it comes to strptime, q.v.
> See the X/Open SUS definition etc.
> This routine needs to be changed for Y2K.
> If you want a test case, I'll maiil one.
>
>
> For strptime( "11/22/02", "%m/%d/%y", &ztm)
> the result for years since 1900 is
>  tm_year;  002
>
> This should be 102 for Y2K compliance.

This is new to me.  I would have said that strptime is correct, and
the idea of re-interpreting "02" worries me.  Can you give me a URL,
please?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980515110310.A305>