From owner-freebsd-net  Sun Oct 10 21:35:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F9114E57
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: from current1.whiste.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22])
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA81760;
	Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 1999 21:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: Mark Summerfield <m.summerfield@ee.mu.oz.au>
Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>,
	Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: arp errors on machines with two interfaces
In-Reply-To: <199910110153.LAA19461@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910102128180.12833-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Mark Summerfield wrote:
> 
> binding an IP address to the second interface altogether -- that should 
> stop it from delivering broadcast packets to the IP stack.  How's that 
> PPPoE code coming along?! ;-)

NEarly all of the pppoe node itself is completed
I'm just adding finishin gtouches..
after that we need to kook the ppp daemon intoo it which is a separate
task..
in the meanwhile I will have code that can be tested (but not go into ppp
sometime tonight if I don't get sucked into a reallyinteresting TV show
tonight.

julian




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message