From owner-freebsd-current Mon Sep 11 18:48:21 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA15441 for current-outgoing; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:48:21 -0700 Received: from pelican.com (pelican.com [134.24.4.62]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA15435 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:48:18 -0700 Received: from puffin.pelican.com by pelican.com with smtp (Smail3.1.28.1 #5) id m0ssKRj-000K2lC; Mon, 11 Sep 95 18:47 WET DST Received: by puffin.pelican.com (Smail3.1.29.1 #9) id m0ssKRj-0000RfC; Mon, 11 Sep 95 18:47 PDT Message-Id: From: pete@puffin.pelican.com (Pete Carah) Subject: DEC 21041 To: current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Sep 1995 18:47:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 387 Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I'm blessed with a supply of SMC cards using DEC 21041 instead of 21040; all their new cards come this way. This isn't recognized by de0 driver (and may not even be recognized by the PCI probes?). It also isn't recognized by last spring's SMC windoze driver or diganostic, so they really did something to it. Does anyone know what the difference is and what patch is needed? -- Pete