Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:25:13 -0800
From:      Rob <rob@pythonemproject.com>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, "freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: fsck's, "current" vs "earlier releases"
Message-ID:  <3DDF9DD9.FAB5DF7A@pythonemproject.com>
References:  <p05200f03ba050fc38afc@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Garance,

This happened to me also.  The solution was to run fsck on the older
versions, but tell it to use an alternate superblock.  See man fsck.  I
forget the details, but it worked for me.

Rob.

Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> 
> I'm playing around with installing a number of freebsd releases on
> the same PC, and something came up which makes me a little uneasy.
> I understand why I am seeing what I'm seeing, I'm just uneasy about
> what it might mean for people who will pick up 5.0-release and start
> testing it on their own machines.
> 
> I have 4.6.2-release, 4.7-release, and 5.0-dp2-release on a single PC.
> After some bouncing between versions, and an occasional 'disklabel'
> command, I seem to have the partitions for 4.6.2 in an odd state.
> Both 4.7 and 5.0-dp2 have no problem mounting them, but if I try to
> boot up the 4.6.2 system it fails because 4.6.2 finds that "values
> in super block disagree with those in first alternate".  4.6.2 wants
> me to 'fsck' the partitions manually, but I *think* I remember that
> using the older fsck might cause trouble.
> 
> For my own PC none of this is critical, because I'm just doing a few
> quick tests and at this point I don't even need to boot up 4.6.2.  I
> just wonder how much of an issue this will be for people who setup
> their machines to dual-boot between 5.0-release (once it *is* released)
> and "something a little older".  4.7 has no trouble, but even 4.6.2
> (which is not all that old) can be confused by the subtle changes in
> UFS which will show up in 5.0-release.
> 
> I am not suggesting we must do something about this, I'm just a
> little uneasy about the situation.  Okay, well maybe I should try at
> least one suggestion.  Should we tell people that they *must* update
> 'fsck' on *other* (multi-boot) systems before installing 5.0-release?
> 
> --
> Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
> Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

-- 
-----------------------------
The Numeric Python EM Project

www.pythonemproject.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DDF9DD9.FAB5DF7A>