From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Apr 25 03:39:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA06997
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 03:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca33-03.ix.netcom.com [199.35.209.99])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA06992
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 03:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id DAA24764; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704251039.DAA24764@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org, jdp@polstra.com
In-reply-to: <6128.861964240@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: ftp://freefall.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/LOCAL_PORTS
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Make ftp.freebsd.org the primary site and let the backups be any
 * mirrors we can get for it.  I'm sure we can get at least the
 * neosoft mirror to replicate it (ftp3.freebsd.org).

I'm talking about the "regular" backup as defined in MASTER_SITE_BACKUP.

What's wrong with using hub?  We can have one site in the Makefile,
plus the regular backup on ftp.freebsd.org or wherever the user choses 
in /etc/make.conf.  Just like any other port.

And if you mean have two sites in the Makefile, unless both those
names are symbolic (e.g., ftp-local and ftp-local2), I wouldn't want
to do that.  (Or we have to edit all the Makefiles again when we
change ftp3's name or something.)

Satoshi