Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:19:48 -0400 From: "Jud" <judmarc@fastmail.fm> To: jesse@wingnet.net, "freebsd-questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Openoffice 1.1 + native java Message-ID: <20031017201948.C68EA75583@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <bmpgek$h4o$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <20031016165951.GH624@databias.co.za> <1066317025.5ank7lwxjf4s@www.sweetdreamsracing.biz> <20031017172344.GA17910@databias.co.za><bmpdvf$bs0$1@sea.gmane.org> <bmpgek$h4o$1@sea.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 15:37:55 -0400, "Jesse Guardiani" <jesse@wingnet.net> said: > Jud wrote: [snip] > > If you cvsup the ports tree, you can choose to install from either ports > > or packages. > > > Do you run a cvsuped ports tree? I used to run one last year, and I could > never install from a package because the ports tree was in a constant > state > of flux. I'm probably just being thick, but I'm not sure what cvsup-ing the ports has to do with availability/installability of packages. What have you read in the Handbook or elsewhere that gives you the impression one would interfere with the other? > What does your cvsup config file look like? It's just the ports-supfile copied from /usr/share/examples/cvsup. > How often do you run it? About once every week or two. Jud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031017201948.C68EA75583>