From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 18:21:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EFB106564A for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [66.246.138.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CB68FC0A for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40D71905E; Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:21:27 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on muon X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 Received: from tau.draftnet (unknown [66.45.161.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sun, 2 Nov 2008 13:21:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:21:17 -0800 From: Bruce Cran To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20081102102117.0818f271@tau.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20081102183212.G18776@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <490C0159.3000908@rawbw.com> <20081101163322.B10508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081102164309.GE3366@georg.localdomain> <20081102183212.G18776@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; amd64-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "\(-K JohnNy" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is KDE4 usable on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:21:29 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 18:32:39 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > You have to realize that this is the question of every user's > > individual needs. Some users, like for example yourself, like going > > deep, using the shell for tasks from everyday life, some users are > > more GUI-oriented and like somewhat more graphic approach to the > > same tasks. > > true. that's why there unix and there windows. > > don't mix. And what about OS X? To me it seems it's a combination of the user-friendliness of Windows with the power of *NIX. And lots of people have moved over to using it. -- Bruce Cran