From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Jun 23 16:23:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D020B730AF for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 020B81977 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id u64so113661933vkf.3 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MCmFJPm0c/JcXADKYzvW7+m8rbBlOK2JVf3AxJj+Fiw=; b=fkaOklH5a/ZJDD+81abz1OfE/gUk59YKZs18PRWaqVbLP3WID8SL5usWRlTsdb9/q+ GZ3QJ+O/NiJkdHmX3gadPqeDdV++mhScyNWINeZaH4vg+LIPWCIx25p3GJp1kr1bcBIm TW/TFNd9MolPMmBJlkJx9M0twNBmCBNRDx74Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MCmFJPm0c/JcXADKYzvW7+m8rbBlOK2JVf3AxJj+Fiw=; b=cUVbE/gGUkgNNcUYxja+So5+5BL/UQxFjcosq4A6PbxijhcIbessP20a8FI52uBbS9 dswVBLIgROxNgDgvbCdA928b0Cud20t8M5BmtWPpAxMLKWvT2gWYFDfKBTueX82GFQ11 YXkx3d4tF9ODCDFGG3uSGDFKul+BZc7v8y8ihd2tmIEsQKpHHfQh/F8Jwwl5huQ+ITMx KUxvoyRV9MCsqfL03e6XKNJ/V06YlKMctrw3L12PZX+/WAV5URDrdfOqbWMMRPHWcdha bHiGJc2e2foKRhPTomAtK9sIKKcQb2HL71TKjxQuHqHqtctBeHhCpYntkyw0kmJtfmAt 6I6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLwEGWRjCaPX0erv2rkRTj/B8uozPUWX/tk8FPUgLFvaEO1FAGG4UXXJF3KeuPmBg== X-Received: by 10.176.64.166 with SMTP id i35mr15842168uad.105.1466699010796; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.18] ([187.60.94.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 48sm323725uat.9.2016.06.23.09.23.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Poor performance when using urtwn on beaglebone black To: Adrian Chadd References: <8751579c-68ae-7330-eb9b-c67d84ae18db@bsd.com.br> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Message-ID: <9688c9e7-3619-82ef-a10e-00ef97d435c4@bsd.com.br> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:23:27 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 16:23:32 -0000 I did the tests with two adapters. Bellow RTL8192CU poor performance % dmesg | grep urtwn urtwn0: on usbus1 urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8192CU, RF 6052 2T2R urtwn0: enabling 11n % netperf -H squitch MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to squitch () port 0 AF_INET : histogram : interval : dirty data : demo Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 65536 32768 32768 10.72 1.06 good performance (after create the interface using -ht) % dmesg | grep urtwn urtwn0: on usbus1 urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8192CU, RF 6052 2T2R urtwn0: enabling 11n % netperf -H squitch MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to squitch () port 0 AF_INET : histogram : interval : dirty data : demo Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 65536 32768 32768 10.16 7.41 ===================================================================================== poor performance for RTL8188CUS % dmesg | grep urtwn urtwn0: on usbus1 urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8188CUS, RF 6052 1T1R urtwn0: enabling 11n % netperf -H squitch MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to squitch () port 0 AF_INET : histogram : interval : dirty data : demo Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 65536 32768 32768 14.03 0.02 good performance (after create the interface using -ht) urtwn0: on usbus1 urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8188CUS, RF 6052 1T1R urtwn0: enabling 11n % netperf -H squitch MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to squitch () port 0 AF_INET : histogram : interval : dirty data : demo Recv Send Send Socket Socket Message Elapsed Size Size Size Time Throughput bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec 65536 32768 32768 10.15 5.81 Em 23/06/2016 13:06, Adrian Chadd escreveu: > which urtwn is it? can you do a dmesg | grep urtwn? > > I'd like to see which NIC it is and whether firmware rate control is working. > > Thanks, > > > > -adrian > > > On 22 June 2016 at 10:52, Otacílio wrote: >> Dears >> >> I'm getting poor performance when using wifi by urtwn on beaglebone black. >> I'm using netperf to do benchmarks and I'm getting less than 1Mbps normally >> and between 3Mbps and 7.5Mbps when creating the interface with -ht option. I >> think that previous versions has better performance. >> >> FreeBSD beaglebone 11.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 11.0-ALPHA4 #0 r302064: Wed Jun 22 >> 00:25:52 BRT 2016 >> ota@squitch:/root/workdir/crochet/work/obj/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/BEAGLEBONE >> arm >> >> []'s >> >> -Otacílio >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"