From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 17 13:15:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215A716A41F; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (host2.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B5A43D73; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from matrix.gatewaynet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by matrix.gatewaynet.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9HD9bSv031740; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:09:37 +0300 Received: from localhost (achill@localhost) by matrix.gatewaynet.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id j9HD9bPx031736; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:09:37 +0300 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:09:37 +0300 (EEST) From: Achilleus Mantzios To: Wes Peters In-Reply-To: <1B8112AF-8C0E-4BA0-8D1C-DA6AD529F327@softweyr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:16:20 +0000 Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@freebsd.org, freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, Norikatsu Shigemura , rtdean@cytherianage.net, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon , Panagiotis Astithas , freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:15:07 -0000 O Wes Peters έγραψε στις Oct 16, 2005 : > > On Oct 16, 2005, at 3:20 AM, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > > As to devel vs. editors, eclipse is hardly a text editor. Emacs at > least started that way. Perhaps i missed something, but why all that bother with eclipse, when (at least) all the java add-ons for it are easily managed by the tool itself? For possible JNI eclipse plugins (if any) a port definately makes sense but for the majority (java) i think the community over engineers the case instead of working on more vital issues of the operation system. I am not quoting directly any of the fellows participating in the discussion, i just grabbed the last email to write my lines. > > Wes Peters > wes@softweyr.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- -Achilleus