From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 8 20:33:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652E537BA72 for ; Mon, 8 May 2000 20:33:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA29201; Tue, 9 May 2000 03:33:20 GMT (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <14620.957842046@localhost> Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 13:03:20 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: RE: What do people think of maybe using the sourceforge software Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 09-May-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > I think it's also reasonable to say that FreeBSD itself is a bit too > large to register and run as a sourceforge project, but why not use > the same software to offer a higher level of "polish" to the existing > project infrastructure? Comments? I'm just playing with this stuff a > bit myself right now and will say more once I actually know more about > it. Well, the questions I have are.. 1) Will it scale with 200 developers and (if we put the pr's into the source forge interface) all the prs? 2) How much stuff well get moved over to sit under the new interface, and how hard will that be to accomplish? :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message