From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May 23 16:59:45 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA22073
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 23 May 1995 16:59:45 -0700
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA22067
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 May 1995 16:59:44 -0700
Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14464(2)>; Tue, 23 May 1995 16:59:00 PDT
Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <49871>; Tue, 23 May 1995 16:58:53 -0700
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6 4/21/95
To: Brad Midgley <brad@pht.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, junkmail@pht.com
Subject: Re: CAP status in current? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 May 95 13:38:28 PDT."
             <Pine.LNX.3.91.950523141059.5507A-100000@exodus.pht.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 16:58:43 PDT
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Message-Id: <95May23.165853pdt.49871@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <Pine.LNX.3.91.950523141059.5507A-100000@exodus.pht.com> you write:
>I've been wondering if -current compiles Columbia Appletalk cleanly.

I was under the impression that netatalk would make more sense, since it puts 
more of the protocol handling in the kernel.  I haven't looked at this stuff 
for a while, though...

  Bill