From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 22:47:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C62616A41F; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E5743D49; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 22:47:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j77Mievh084431; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:44:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:45:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20050807.164544.16299165.imp@bsdimp.com> To: stijn@win.tue.nl From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20050807214618.GG70957@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20050807160452.GF70957@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <42F632B3.90704@freebsd.org> <20050807214618.GG70957@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 07 Aug 2005 16:44:41 -0600 (MDT) Cc: cperciva@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 22:47:01 -0000 In message: <20050807214618.GG70957@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Stijn Hoop writes: : And last but certainly not least: thank you for sharing your software : in the first place! Agreed! I'd love to see the tools that are used to create the streams available. Many people will have need for it, and I think that we'd do them a disservice to not make them available. Having said that, I've had all of my concerns about this answered and think it is a great idea to put portsnap into the base. I'd like to see the generators in the tree too, but I'd not stand in the way of having the base functionality there before the generators are there. Warner