From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 12:03:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9792316A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3EED43D1F for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB6BA72DBF; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77F572DB5; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:03:08 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Namik Dala In-Reply-To: <20040121022923.GB17110@snickers.dahoam> Message-ID: <20040123120155.A61090@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20040120144747.GB13132@snickers.dahoam> <20040121022923.GB17110@snickers.dahoam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS: Processes marked "in disk" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:03:09 -0000 For the record, It is NOT RECOMMENDED to put mail spools on NFS volumes. NFS locking is not reliable and you WILL get corrupted spools or other wierd locking behavior. Particularly with FreeBSD where NFS locking just started working in 5.x. In 4.x, it was all a sham :-) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org