From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 27 11:51:12 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA04069 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 11:51:12 -0800 Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA04059; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 11:51:01 -0800 Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id IAA04715; Mon, 27 Feb 1995 08:31:31 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 08:31:31 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199502271531.IAA04715@trout.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: Richard Tobin "Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD" (Feb 27, 3:09pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Richard Tobin , "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Just to re-iterate, my suggestion is to (a) make ld.so compatible and a) Will be done shortly. The patches are applied to the CVS sources on freefall, but I'm a bit paranoid and I'm waiting a couple more days for Poul to blow something up. > (b) have something in the executable to indicate which libraries it > was linked against. This would be a bit more difficult, but not that much. I won't have time to do this (I've got a full plate believe it or not) but I'd be willing to test out the changes if/when they get done. Nate