Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 01:23:00 +0300
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports with bad plist when NO{DOCS,EXAMPLES,PORTDATA} defined
Message-ID: <20080520012300.45e74175@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.ube9kza09aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References: <20080519215010.68ce1dff@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <op.ube3zepk9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20080519233159.274c9f42@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <op.ube5g4aw9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20080520000759.27ca8d20@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <op.ube716u49aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20080520004617.1264d9e5@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <op.ube9kza09aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/ubmj.GBoX=Q6FnN6AMVTpsO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 May 2008 17:18:25 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > > And how are updates tested - except when you hijack pointyhat :) ? =20 >=20 > I think, most of us don't test it until pointyhat complain it. ;-) It's = =20 :-D > very rare for *-reference ports to change with PORTDOCS=3D* unless they = =20 > added something like sometime ago doxygen/devhelp were added in =20 > glibmm-reference and we got pointyhat error log for that. Well, also got = =20 > your error log for different case in same port. >=20 > If I modify or rewrite reference framework, I would use static plist =20 > instead of PORTDOCS=3D* and remove NOPORTDOCS option. It means that we wi= ll =20 > have to test *-reference ports' plist at the each update. I don't know if= =20 > my team will like it, so I will have to ask if I am going to touch =20 > reference framework (don't have time for that right now). Not using PORTDOCS and not supporting NOPORTDOCS are different things, no? On my desktop /usr/local/shre/docs is about 400MB. I had to fit recently a pretty complex system on a small thingy. Had to go in and remove a lot of things by hand o have place for the base system and the port plus for some data. > BTW/OT: I am against automatic dynamic pkg-plist: =20 > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsToDo#head-d39af25709360f5285b40c03255de7465f= a717fa =20 > .. I perfer static plist, I use it awful a lot in offline. I wouldn't hav= e =20 > done share/gnome/ -> share/ quick without that static plist. Also it help= s =20 > a lot to notice if file(s) install in the wrong place. I use it a lot to = =20 > know which file/directory come from port. Yeh, I'm all in favor of having all files listed in pkg-plist. --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/ubmj.GBoX=Q6FnN6AMVTpsO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkgx/c8ACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeWd2wCdHljqDPJ9RgqQ7A1WWUfbUJJd pMEAoK+Zbl9Z8FCgs9tufCac+7UePvuz =JGLr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ubmj.GBoX=Q6FnN6AMVTpsO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080520012300.45e74175>