From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 24 08:17:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 86723FF2; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:17:37 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] PH tells crap about GMAKE (Was: Re: svn commit: r340018 - head/textproc/scew) Message-ID: <20140124081737.GA77854@FreeBSD.org> References: <201401170910.s0H9Aw9O087448@svn.freebsd.org> <20140117093546.GA16656@FreeBSD.org> <20140117095020.GD4006@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:17:37 -0000 On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:14:40PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2014-Jan-17, 09:35, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > If possible, particular make(1) implementation should not be referenced in > > > port's Makefile. If you need to call "correct" make(1), use ${MAKE_CMD}, > > > which would be correctly set to "gmake" in this case of yours (per USES= > > > gmake). > > > > That makes sense. What about updating [section] 6.4.2 of the porter's > > handbook? > > Indeed, this section needs some love. [...] > > Please consider attached patch. It is not a polished gem, and most likely > would need a review and wordsmithing from doc@ guys. Retransmit. ./danfe