Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 08:17:37 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] PH tells crap about GMAKE (Was: Re: svn commit: r340018 - head/textproc/scew) Message-ID: <20140124081737.GA77854@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org> References: <201401170910.s0H9Aw9O087448@svn.freebsd.org> <20140117093546.GA16656@FreeBSD.org> <20140117095020.GD4006@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20140117141440.GA94157@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:14:40PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > On 2014-Jan-17, 09:35, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > If possible, particular make(1) implementation should not be referenced in
> > > port's Makefile. If you need to call "correct" make(1), use ${MAKE_CMD},
> > > which would be correctly set to "gmake" in this case of yours (per USES=
> > > gmake).
> >
> > That makes sense. What about updating [section] 6.4.2 of the porter's
> > handbook?
>
> Indeed, this section needs some love. [...]
>
> Please consider attached patch. It is not a polished gem, and most likely
> would need a review and wordsmithing from doc@ guys.
Retransmit.
./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140124081737.GA77854>