From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  9 04:53:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ECF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2005 04:53:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58DB43D1D
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2005 04:53:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com)
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so1040998rne
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:53:55 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=NolNVQbYxXhZN1F1BxUSO1XHIuypf4PdlO6crb10f2NPDmlQdUN89GSeAyM3lj6YNMpiaNv0TSxMoq2XYudMzy43SWE4TcD4XiKqZFRWfMVEED+f5s6Aci5921KLo36ko90zmIegRmYcynSnpnSJPSxbrVKdn8B9jboc5tUHl58=
Received: by 10.38.9.14 with SMTP id 14mr207073rni;
        Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ef60af0905020820535d683d3b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 05:53:55 +0100
From: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com>
To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net
In-Reply-To: <420991C1.2030808@taborandtashell.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <ef60af090502081934648df9fa@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1107920345.41909.2.camel@codegurus.org>
	 <ef60af09050208195068c1798e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <420991C1.2030808@taborandtashell.net>
cc: Mick Walker <mwalker@codegurus.org>
cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: GTK vs QT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 04:53:56 -0000

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:29:53 -0800, Tabor Kelly
<tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net> wrote:
> Gert Cuykens wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:39:05 +0000, Mick Walker <mwalker@codegurus.org> wrote:
> >
> >>Why would you make a statement like that without making points to back
> >>it up?
> >
> >
> > because i dont have points except that qt can kiss my $$$ :)
> >
> > no i am just wondering what you guy's think thats all i lookt around
> > on the internet a bit but that was old stuff about gtk1 and so.
> 
> I have read the QT is far more efficient and that the only reason anyone
> uses GTK is for licensing reasons. Any comments? Also, not to mention
> that QT is fully portable to M$ Windows.
> 

i knew you where going to say that , let me fire some counter measures
by saying that GTK2 + GIMP works excellent on windows XP