From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 24 02:11:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA22834 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 02:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from witch.xtra.co.nz (witch.xtra.co.nz [202.27.184.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA22826 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 02:10:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from junkmale@pop3.xtra.co.nz) Received: from wocker (210-55-210-32.ipnets.xtra.co.nz [210.55.210.32]) by witch.xtra.co.nz (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA13178; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:09:20 +1200 (NZST) Message-Id: <199808240909.VAA13178@witch.xtra.co.nz> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: Craig Beasland Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:09:21 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: RE: NT vs FreeBSD Reply-to: junkmale@xtra.co.nz CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <002e01bdcf31$1b3f6ad0$0a1e21cb@superbruce.hotmix.com.au> References: <19980821141844.16052.qmail@wolf.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 24 Aug 98, at 15:33, Craig Beasland wrote: > Also, a well built NT box is more secure than a poorly built BSD one - > wouldn't you agree. Is the above indeed what you meant to say? I would have expected something like 'less secure' to be mentioned on a FreeBSD mailing list. -- Dan Langille DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - my [mis]adventures http://www.dvl-software.com/freebsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message