From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 14 08:54:34 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2251065673;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (unknown [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C536F8FC12;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p8E8sUL3016120;
	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:54:30 +0700 (NOVST)
	(envelope-from egrosbein@rdtc.ru)
Message-ID: <4E706BC1.9030203@rdtc.ru>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:54:25 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <egrosbein@rdtc.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU;
	rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110112 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vladimir Budnev <vladimir.budnev@gmail.com>
References: <4E7066CE.3070702@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E7066CE.3070702@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPFW hidden/broken rule? (Free 7.2)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:54:34 -0000

14.09.2011 15:33, Vladimir Budnev пишет:

> So i think there are at least to questions:
> 
> 1. Have anyone ever met such situation? Or may be something close to 
> this one with 'hidden' ipfw rules?

Have you tried "ipfw -d -e show"?

Eugene Grosbein